Blog

Netflix to Qwikster: Brand Development Gone Bad?

James Anderson

Many of you have heard about the issues concerning Netflix and its change in service, some of you might have even be affected by the recent 60 percent price increase. Netflix also introduced their newly branded DVD service, Qwikster. These decisions have caused a huge uproar in their client base, resulting in thousands of cancellations and an 11 percent drop in their stock.

There are several lessons that can be learned from Netflix splitting off their DVD service and creating a weak brand to run it. I put together five things that I think they could have done to avoid the chaos and confusion.

1 –Timing is everything.
As any good marketer will tell you, there are some really bad times to launch a new product or brand. August is a bad time of year since many people are not really paying close attention due to vacations, back to school and so on. January is another bad time of year—it is when customers are all shopped out and are recovering from the holidays.

2 – Apology not accepted!
CEO Reed Hastings announced the new Qwikster brand in the eighth paragraph of an apology email for some previous poor communication. Now I may not be the best marketer on the planet, or even on my block, but this is just a bad idea and does nothing for your brand development.


Netflix Apology Email



3 – Giving DVD’s a bad name.
A sure sign of poor brand development is how many ways people can misspell your name. You can expect a huge surge of Google searches with many users searching for names like Quickster, Quikster, Qwickster, you get the point.

The name Qwikster itself is a weak name and easily forgettable. There are so many names Netflix could have put together to create a stronger brand. It seems like they settled on the Qwikster name in a short amount of time and did not spend the time to think things through.

By rushing the branding process, they did not see that the name Qwikster had been taken on a few of the social media channels, and now they are negotiating for the @Qwikster handle on Twitter. The individual using the account is listed as Jason Castillo, and the majority of his posts are laced with sexual innuendo and references to drug use. In one recent gem too foul to post here, Castillo ponders whether or not to “blaze.” The PR department at Netflix will have some fun cleaning up that mess.

4 – Customer confusion – Which way do we go?
Customers don’t like being confused; many will jump ship when they can’t figure things out, or if there is interruption in their current flow of service. There are many questions customers have and nobody seems to have any answers, and that’s likely to cause customers to throw up their hands and leave. If Netflix had been smart about this launch, they would have had a plan and could have prepared a FAQ.

5 – If it’s not broke, don’t fix it!
Have you ever longed for a rebranding of Netflix’s DVD envelopes? Or thought to yourself, “I’d pay for both disc and streaming services if only they had separate names and separate websites?” Me neither, and that’s what makes the changes so annoying to many. Qwikster announced that they will also offer video games for rental. That’s great and all, but their competitors Redbox and Blockbuster already offer this service. The biggest difference: Redbox just released their gaming service this summer and didn’t feel the need to rebrand itself in the process.

With the new brand and service change, the 60 percent price increase to customers, and the loss of Starz Play in the near future, Netflix has left a gap for their competitors to fill. With over 22 million customers who stream, and over 15 million who rent DVDs, customers are now confused and uncertain about the future of the company.

Is it too late for Netflix to turn back and save its own brand image? I don’t think so, but Mr. Hastings would have to move fairly fast and come up with a less confusing brand.

I am curious what many of you think, and how you would fix this situation. What would you have done differently?


Tags: , ,

Comments

7 Responses to “Netflix to Qwikster: Brand Development Gone Bad?”

  1. Taylor says:

    I don’t think Netflix has hit a point of no return. As you so clearly stated, Hastings mishandled the whole situation but I don’t think it is anything a PR pro or marketing master can’t handle. I, for one, am anxious to see the damage control.

  2. Dan Bischoff says:

    No question this is a huge PR blunder. Since this whole fiasco started, they lost a ton of customers and their stock has dived as a result. However, it’s still a great product and value. I’m still a customer …

  3. Rick Vaughn says:

    I don’t think that this is a downfall for Netflix or that Qwikster won’t ever succeed, however it did open the door big time to competition. Their biggest competition right now being the Blockbuster Movie Pass, it’s amazing. Working for DISH Network I got signed up right on 10/1 when it was released and haven’t had an issue since, been streaming the entire time. I’m also getting DVDs (and video games) by mail that I can exchange in the store, it’s amazing!

  4. Jerrod says:

    There is one more thing they really didn’t think through about the name Quickster. Anyone who has been hit up in the last 5-7 years by new-age Amway network marketers knows that they their website is: http://www.quixstar-inc.com. It redirects to the familiar Amway website, and is a bait-and-switch tactic.
    SUPER cheesy name. We have a Netflix subscription, and it really lowered their credibility in our eyes.
    I think you’re right on. They have inadvertently turned off a large portion of their customer base and created a market gap for one or several of their competitors to fill.
    We’re thinking about canceling our subscription entirely.
    They’ve just made it complicated to be a customer. We like it easy and simple.

    • janderson says:

      Thank you for the comment Jerrod and I agree with you. Many people have been turned off by this move and are jumping ship. I currently have Netflix and i am considering it myself since the company does not feel stable and the future of their product is shaky at the moment.

  5. Marilyn says:

    Well written post!

    I thought the Qwikster move was a bad one as well. It turned us off so much, it made us rethink our membership. We dropped our subscription entirely and are now visiting the Redbox and Blockbuster dispensers instead. Before then, we were paying our monthly bill even though the movies sat awhile before we watched them. It was the attached video streaming service that kept us enrolled, in spite of the fact that we rarely used it.

    This move caused a lot of subscribers to take a closer look at what was available from the competition that otherwise would have been content to stay put with Netflix.

  6. James Rognon says:

    As of today, Netflix realized that splitting the company into two was a bad idea. They announced on their blog (link below)”It is clear that for many of our members two websites would make things more difficult, so we are going to keep Netflix as one place to go for streaming and DVDs.”

    The first line about users and two websites demonstrates that Netflix didn’t think things through. It seems like they just got to excited about the money and forgot about the client.

    http://blog.netflix.com/2011/10/dvds-will-be-staying-at-netflixcom.html

Leave a Comment

GET A FREE CONSULTATION

* * * * * *
 

Latest Blog Posts

Apple blogging blogs blog writing brand development brand development strategy Branding Communication content content marketing design email marketing Facebook Google holidays Huffington Post Internet marketing Invisible Children jargon journalists Kony marketing Media Relations memorable brands music online branding online PR online public relations Park City pinterest PR public relations SEO social media social media marketing social media marketing plan social media marketing strategy social media strategy tips tweet Twitter Viral marketing web content marketing Winston Churchill youtube